Free Case Evaluation
You will never be charged a fee unless a recovery is made for you.
Trustwell Law is accepting cases nationwide on behalf of people who used Dupixent injections for at least one month and subsequently developed cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL).
If you or a loved one used Dupixent, developed cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), and are considering filing a Dupixent lawsuit, call us at 800-796-1636 or submit your case details online and someone will contact you shortly. You pay nothing unless your lawsuit is successful and you receive compensation.
At Trustwell Law, our experienced attorneys take a personalized, compassionate approach. We cut through the legalese and partner with our clients. We also have access to the expertise, resources, and manpower to fully investigate each case and fight for and with our clients to get the justice they deserve.
Dupixent (dupilumab) is a medication approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2017 to treat moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (eczema), asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, eosinophilic esophagitis, and prurigo nodularis. Developed by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Dupixent works by blocking interleukin-4 (IL-4) and interleukin-13 (IL-13) signaling pathways to reduce type 2 inflammation. While Dupixent has proven to be effective for many, emerging evidence has sparked a wave of lawsuits alleging that the drug’s manufacturers failed to warn patients and physicians about a serious potential side effect: an increased risk of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), a rare form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that primarily affects the skin.
These Dupixent lawsuits claim that the absence of CTCL warnings on the drug’s label led to delayed diagnoses, as early symptoms of the cancer—such as persistent rashes, plaques, or itching—can mimic eczema flare-ups. Plaintiffs argue that this allowed the disease to progress unchecked, resulting in advanced-stage diagnoses, the need for more aggressive treatment and, in some cases, fatal outcomes. As of October 2025, the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) has logged nearly 300 reports of lymphoma linked to Dupixent, including over 138 cases of CTCL, prompting ongoing regulatory scrutiny but no label update or recall yet.
CTCL is a slow-growing cancer originating in T-cells, a type of white blood cell, that typically presents in the skin before potentially spreading to lymph nodes, blood, or internal organs. Common subtypes include mycosis fungoides (the most prevalent, often starting as scaly patches) and Sézary syndrome (more aggressive, involving widespread redness and circulating cancer cells). Rarer types/variants of CTCL:
CTCL affects about 3,000 new patients annually in the U.S., primarily adults over 50, though Dupixent-related cases appear in younger individuals.
Symptoms include red, itchy patches; thickened plaques; tumors; or generalized erythroderma. Early detection is crucial, but misdiagnosis as eczema is common, especially in patients with long-standing dermatitis.
Multiple research reports link the use of dupilumab, the active ingredient in Dupixent, with CTCL, including a study in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. This study reported an increased risk of CTCL found in a cohort of atopic dermatitis patients who used dupilumab. It also noted that, “The increased risk persisted after exclusion of prior disease-modifying antirheumatic drug use. Risk was not increased for other cutaneous or lymphoid malignancies.” For links to this and other studies, reports, analyses, and findings, please see the Sources section at the bottom of this page.
Dupixent lawsuits are product liability claims centered on failure-to-warn allegations against Sanofi and Regeneron. Filed in federal and state courts since early 2025, these cases contend that the companies knew or should have known about the CTCL risk-based on post-marketing data but that they prioritized sales—over $10 billion annually—over safety updates. A landmark filing in October 2025 includes a wrongful death claim where a patient developed peripheral T-cell lymphoma (a CTCL subtype) after Dupixent injections for eczema, leading to rapid decline and death within months of diagnosis.
Key elements of these lawsuits include:
Litigation is in early stages, with the courts considering multidistrict litigation (MDL) consolidation.
Dupixent Lawyers
If you or a loved one used Dupixent and developed cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), contact us to discuss filing a Dupixent lawsuit. The consultation is free. You pay nothing unless you win your case and receive compensation.
Article Sources
Hasan I, et al. “Dupilumab therapy for atopic dermatitis is associated with increased risk of cutaneous T cell lymphoma: A retrospective cohort study.” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. April 2024. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38588818/
Lavin A, et al. “Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma after Dupilumab Use: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.” Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2024. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38945437/
Park CM, et al. “Cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma following dupilumab use: a systematic review.” International Journal of Dermatology. September 2023. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijd.16388
Reddy S, et al. “Integrative epidemiology and immunotranscriptomics uncover a risk and potential mechanism for cutaneous lymphoma unmasking or progression with dupilumab therapy.” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. November 2024. https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749%2824%2901172-2/fulltext
Ma T, et al. “Risk of lymphoma in patients with asthma treated with dupilumab: A population-based cohort study.” European Respiratory Journal. June 2025. (Referenced in aggregated reports; full access via journal site)
U.S. FDA. “FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard.” Accessed October 2025. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/questions-and-answers-fdas-adverse-event-reporting-system-faers/fda-adverse-event-reporting-system-faers-public-dashboard
You will never be charged a fee unless a recovery is made for you.