Trustwell Law is accepting cases on behalf of firefighters (only) who have been regularly exposed to AFFF (aqueous film-forming foam) and have developed any of the following:
If you are considering filing an AFFF lawsuit, call us at 800-796-1636 or submit your case details online and someone will contact you shortly. You pay nothing unless your lawsuit is successful and you receive compensation.
We are also accepting cases from individuals with ulcerative colitis and/or kidney, liver, pancreatic, prostate, or testicular cancer who were exposed to PFAS in their water.
At Trustwell Law, our experienced attorneys take a personalized, compassionate approach. We cut through the legalese and partner with our clients. We have access to the expertise, resources, and manpower to fully investigate each case and fight for and with our clients to get the justice they deserve.
AFFF is a foam used in firefighting to extinguish fires involving gasoline and other flammable liquids. First developed in the 1960s, AFFF is a concentrate mixed with water that creates a foaming action to enhance the water’s ability to put out those fires. The Department of Defense began using AFFFs extensively in the 1970s on U.S. military bases and aboard its ships around the world to fight fires and in firefighter training. Soon after, civilian firefighters also started using AFFF for training and to put out flammable liquid fires.
Aqueous film-forming foam contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which are man-made chemicals first used in industry in the 1950s. PFAS are sometimes called “forever chemicals” because they don’t break down (biodegrade) naturally. Their use has been phased out in the U.S. as they have been linked to cancer and other health issues.
PFAS in AFFF have been linked to many health issues in animals and humans. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry have linked PFAS to many health problems, including immune system changes, thyroid disorders, liver enzyme changes, and, notably, increased risk of certain cancers.
PFAS in AFFF are toxic and carcinogenic to animals and, potentially, humans, according to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) are the most studied PFAS and are the most common types used in the United States. The IARC classifies perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) as “possibly” carcinogenic to humans.
3M and Dupont and other manufacturers have sold AFFF products for decades. As noted, use of AFFF began in the 1970s. Research shows that in the late 1970s, tests found PFOS chemicals in the blood of workers at PFAS manufacturing plants and in the blood of the general population. A decade later, those same chemicals were shown to cause cancer in animals.
It wasn’t until 2006 that the EPA began a program to reduce PFAS emissions and product content. However, given the history and research, many argue that AFFF manufacturers should have taken action years before. They may have been negligent in their design, engineering, manufacturing, and release of these products.
If you have cancer and were regularly exposed to AFFF, you may be entitled to compensation. Contact us for a free consultation.
3M. (2019). Annual Report. Retrieved from https://s24.q4cdn.com/834031268/files/doc_financials/2019/ar/2019-3m-annual-report.pdf
3M. (2020, March 19). 3M Announces Progress on PFAS Initiatives and Actions. Retrieved from https://news.3m.com/2020-03-19-3M-Announces-Progress-on-PFAS-Initiatives-and-Actions
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. (2020, June 24). Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) and Your Health. Retrieved from https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/health-effects/index.html
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. (2020, June 24). What are the health effects of PFAS? Retrieved from https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/health-effects/index.html
Andrews, D. (2020, March 9). FDA Studies: ‘Short-chain’ PFAS Chemicals More Toxic Than Previously Thought. Retrieved from https://www.ewg.org/news-insights/news/fda-studies-short-chain-pfas-chemicals-more-toxic-previously-thought
Avsec, R. (2021, June 8). ‘Forever chemicals’: What firefighters need to know about AFFF and PFAS. Retrieved from https://www.firerescue1.com/firefighting-foam/articles/forever-chemicals-what-firefighters-need-to-know-about-afff-and-pfas-8pdsKB4G2G1fJoIM/
Avsec, R. (2020, July 27). How safe is firefighting foam? Retrieved from https://www.firerescue1.com/firefighter-safety/articles/how-safe-is-firefighting-foam-NlYF6zhwXGmSlV8e/
Bloomberg. (2020, March 2). DuPont Owes $50 Million in PFAS Cancer Cases, Jury Finds (Corrected). Retrieved from https://news.bloomberglaw.com/environment-and-energy/dupont-owes-50-million-in-latest-pfas-cancer-cases-jury-finds
Chase, R. (2021, January 23). DuPont, Chemours reach agreement over ‘forever chemicals.’ Retrieved from https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/dupont-chemours-reach-agreement-forever-chemicals-75448051
DuPont. (2017, February 13). DuPont Reaches Global Settlement of Multi-District PFOA Litigation. Retrieved from https://www.dupont.com/news/dupont-reaches-global-settlement-of-multi-district-pfoa-litigation.html
DuPont. (2020, December 31). Form 10-K. Retrieved from http://d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001666700/292396da-f0bf-45ba-bb85-5a6342ed8a4f.pdf
EWG. (n.d.). Timeline of internal DOD studies and reports. Retrieved from https://www.ewg.org/dodpfastimeline/
Hitchcock, L. (2021, October 5). FAA must end the use of polluting PFAS firefighting foam. Retrieved from https://saferchemicals.org/2021/10/05/faa-must-end-the-use-of-polluting-pfas-firefighting-foam/
Interstate Technology Regulatory Council. (2020, April). Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF). Retrieved from https://pfas-1.itrcweb.org/fact_sheets_page/PFAS_Fact_Sheet_AFFF_April2020.pdf
International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2021). IARC Monographs On The Identification Of Carcinogenic Hazards To Humans. Retrieved from https://monographs.iarc.who.int/list-of-classifications
Jackson v. 3M Company et al. (2021, January 15). Class Action Complaint. Retrieved from https://aboutlawsuits-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2021-1-15-afff-class-action.pdf
Kabadi, S., et al. (2020, February 1). Characterizing biopersistence potential of the metabolite 5:3 fluorotelomer carboxylic acid after repeated oral exposure to the 6:2 fluorotelomer alcohol. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0041008X20300028?via%3Dihub
Lannan, K. (2021, September 8). Toxic Firefighting Foams A Challenge To Quickly Replace. Retrieved from https://www.wbur.org/news/2021/09/08/massachusetts-pfas-firefighting-foam-replacement
Lerner, S. (2018, February 18). The U.S. Military is Spending Millions to Replace Toxic Firefighting Foam with Toxic Firefighting Foam. Retrieved from https://theintercept.com/2018/02/10/firefighting-foam-afff-pfos-pfoa-epa/
Luz, A., et al. (2019, April). Perfluorohexanoic acid toxicity, part I: Development of a chronic human health toxicity value for use in risk assessment. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230019300194?dgcid=raven_sd_aip_email
Naidenko, O., et al. (, June 9). Credibility Gap: Toxic Chemicals in Food Packaging. Retrieved from https://www.ewg.org/research/credibility-gap-toxic-chemicals-food-packaging
Neltner, T. (2019, February 20). The elephant in the room: potential biopersistence of short-chain PFAS. Retrieved from http://blogs.edf.org/health/2019/02/20/potential-biopersistence-short-chain-pfas/
Place, B., and J. Field. (2012, June 15). Identification of Novel Fluorochemicals in Aqueous Film-Forming Foams (AFFF) Used by the US Military. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3390017/
Rice, P., et al. (2020, April). Comparative analysis of the toxicological databases for 6:2 fluorotelomer alcohol (6:2 FTOH) and perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA). Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0278691520300983?via%3Dihub
Smith, J. (2021, November 21). Toxic firefighting foam may have harmed U.S. service members. Retrieved from https://fox28media.com/news/nation-world/toxic-firefighting-foam-may-have-harmed-us-servicemembers
Sterman, J., A. Brauer, and A. Nejman. (2021, November 29). Toxic firefighting foam: Exclusive documents show military knew about the risk for years. Retrieved from https://fox17.com/news/spotlight-on-america/toxic-firefighting-foam-newly-obtained-emails-show-military-knew-about-the-risk-for-years
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2021, October 18).). PFAS Explained. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/pfas/pfas-explained
U.S. Fire Administration. (2020, February 11). The Hidden Dangers in Firefighting Foam. Retrieved from https://www.usfa.fema.gov/blog/cb-021120.html